Same form two different versions of foxincloud, different result
This with 2.31.beta4
This with 2.31.beta6
No button in grid column and when i clicked on the column where there was the button a new form is opened like i do with the button. the new form depends for the value in the column3 but with version 2.31.beta6 always the same form is opened. In 2.31.beta4 i can open different forms one for HD one for PM one for GE
Hi Michel
You should come back to version 2.31 in beta 5, beta 6 seems to have some problems!
Regards
Gilles
Ciao Michele,
To analyze and fix the issue, we need to compare the HTML
and JS
code generated in both versions.
On the FoxInCloud Live Tutorial, the command button is generated OK in a grid column:
Can you share the HTML
and JS
generated from your form in beta.4
and beta.6
? Or even better compare these 2 couples of files using WinMerge
and share the differences?
Thanks in advance
Hello Gilles,
Do you also have a generation issue with V2.31.0-beta.6
?
If yes, do you have the same symptom as Michele?
Anyone else?
Also, have you checked the developer console for possible JavaScript errors?
I haven't had time to test yet
Here are the files... I tested with beta5 and i have no problems... In the same form i have another problem. In this form i have a pageframe and in each page i have a button to return to main page. This button doesn't work.
This button doesn't work
JavaScript Error?
Thanks,
The slight differences between these files don't explain the issue…
Do you have the problem in dev. or prod.?
If in prod. only, make sure to update awScript/*.*
on your production server…
Using xxxProd.Update.prg
is the simplest and safest way.
No errors in js... Problem still in dev mode on my server
I confirm.
Many problems with input and label. Details to come ...
I need more details to understand… please share more debugging info. and/or a test URL, with a complete explanation how to reach the test case and reproduce the issue.
I don't know which details..... i have a version where a page works and a version where the same code used before doesn't work... If someone want to see directly the problem i can show it.... if someone want to access to my dev machine to verify it, no problem, but i can't make every time the debug for others... I continue to use beta4... In beta6 it is a fact that something doesn't work correctly
OK then we need to switch to private support. I'll PM you for an appointment.
thanks to our private session, V 2.31.0-beta.7
released today should fix the issue… do you confirm?